You can follow the product questions without writing Rust. When a code block is useful, read its domain words first: verify identity, admit registration, record it, then handle the follow-up.
This contract says what verification can produce:
pub trait VerifyIdentity: private::Stage + Sized {
type Registered: RecordedRegistration;
type Verified: AdmitRegistration<Registered = Self::Registered>;
fn verify(self) -> Result<Self::Verified, IdentityFailure>;
}
| Code | Plain Meaning |
|---|---|
trait VerifyIdentity |
A contract that provides identity verification. |
type Verified: AdmitRegistration |
Its successful next value must support registration admission. |
Registered = Self::Registered |
The next contract preserves the declared registration-result type. |
fn verify(self) |
Calling verification consumes this submitted stage. |
Result<..., IdentityFailure> |
At runtime it returns a successful next stage or an identity failure. |
private::Stage |
Outside callers cannot freely invent implementations of this protected stage. |
Sized |
This contract uses an ordinary statically sized receiver; it does not mean a state must be zero-sized. |
The declaration connects a legitimate successor. It does not say that every submitted assertion is valid.
Engineering Depth
Read a consuming chain from left to right:
shop.signup(assertion)
.verify()?
.admit()?
.record()
.into_followups()
This is a fragment inside a function whose error type can represent the declared failures. ? returns early on a failure; it does not ignore it. The reference's known-valid test consumer uses unwrap() instead. That test shorthand would be inappropriate for handling arbitrary user input in an application.
Compare two receivers:
| Signature Fragment | What the Caller Retains |
|---|---|
fn inspect(&self) |
A borrow; the caller still owns the value. |
fn finish(self) |
Ownership moves into the call. A non-copyable value cannot then be reused. |
In &'a mut Workshop, &mut is an exclusive borrow and 'a names how long that borrow can be used. It can stop local code from swapping a resource while a stage uses it. It does not lock another process or make data survive a crash.
More syntax: :: selects an associated item, . calls through a value, and <P> supplies a type parameter. Follow the glossary when a term still hides a product question.
Your Reflection
Which part says that admission is the legitimate next operation? Which part represents the possibility that the identity provider is unavailable?
Saved in this browser. Export a copy before changing devices.
Worked Discussion
The associated successor bound Verified: AdmitRegistration supplies the first relationship. Result<..., IdentityFailure> supplies the runtime alternative. The compiler can enforce the declared relationship while a real request still fails at the provider boundary.